Leclerc’s elusive “perfect weekend”

All too often for Charles Leclerc in recent weeks, the chequered flag has heralded commiserations rather than champagne. Ferrari’s latest strategic error at Silverstone leaves the Monégasuqe in a precarious position.

Leclerc headed into the British Grand Prix declaring that he needed a “perfect weekend” to get his title challenge back on-track. With just over 10 laps remaining on Sunday, it looked like Leclerc would get just that. Despite suffering front-wing damage to his single-seater Ferrari on the first-lap, his race pace was unparalleled.

Meanwhile, further back, Max Verstappen’s Red Bull was limping its way to just a smattering of points. Having run over debris after snatching the lead from Carlos Sainz, the reigning world champion damaged his floor and received a puncture.

When he emerged from his emergency pit-stop, it was clear that the Dutchman wouldn’t be competing for the podium places. Prior to the late safety car, brought out by a mechanical failure to Esteban Ocon’s Alpine, Verstappen was clinging onto ninth position. At that point, the points swing in Leclerc’s favour would have been 23, but after the latest chapter in Ferrari’s novel of strategic hiccups, the Monégasuqe driver only closed the gap by a mere six points. Leclerc therefore remains third in the championship and 43 points adrift of Verstappen.

It is another opportunity missed, and with a performative Red Bull and an improving Mercedes, he can’t count on having too many more. For his part, Leclerc can hardly do much more. Since errors in the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix and then a litany of errors whilst attempting to catch Verstappen in Miami, Leclerc has driven impeccably.

However, that hasn’t manifested itself in race wins. As it stands, Leclerc hasn’t stood upon the top step of the podium since the Australian Grand Prix in April, whilst he hasn’t touched the podium since Miami in April. That record isn’t a reflection on Leclerc, but on the reliability of his machinery and the incompetence of the strategists.

Arguably, Leclerc is producing the best racing of his career. In the dying laps at Silverstone, having been left a sitting duck on his worn hard tyres, Leclerc defended impeccably from Sergio Perez and Lewis Hamilton, who had the pace on their fresh sets of softs. Even when he looked defeated, Leclerc pulled off one of the overtakes of the season on Hamilton as he went around the outside of the Brit at Stowe corner.

Although it will likely make the highlights reel of Leclerc’s greatest overtakes, it was ultimately in vain. There was no resisting the charging Mercedes. To have held onto fourth position was an achievement in itself. The blame, as it did in Monaco, rests solely on the shoulders of his Ferrari team.

Charles Leclerc with Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto, photo courtesy Scuderia Ferrari Press Office

Post-race, Leclerc was pictured in discussion with Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto; from the photographic evidence, it was seemingly a frank, intense discussion. Such conversations should have looked very different and should have taken place just prior to the Monégasque driver making the journey up to the podium. Instead, Leclerc and Binotto crossed paths on their way back to the paddock, the latter once again offering commiserations, whilst the former should have been savouring the champagne-flavoured taste of victory with another winners’ trophy added to his cabinet.

Rumours surrounding the nature of the discussion proliferated upon the release of the images. Leclerc put them to bed, revealing, “He wanted to get my morale back up”. Race victories have a greater effect than words in achieving that goal.

But Leclerc hardly needs a pep-talk, rather it is on his team to deliver. Asked about his team’s mistakes in recent races, he replied, “It’s not good. I have to say that I feel like I’m showing that every race it’s not affecting me too much. But I would rather not have these problems.”

As the season has progressed, there has been a reversal in doubt. Leclerc’s performances in Spain, Canada and England in particular have extinguished doubts as to whether he is world champion material. Blessed with the best car on the grid, it is now the pit wall that is being called into question. Can they capitalise on the great work done in the factory to deliver their lead driver a title for the first time since Kimi Räikkönen in 2007?

Charles Leclerc at the British GP, photo courtesy Scuderia Ferrari Press Office

With increasing regularity, Binotto’s post-race comments accrue greater importance and attention, and Silverstone was no different. On Sunday he said, “I knew that he (Leclerc) was disappointed and frustrated, which is understandable as he clearly led the race and was at ease at the moment at which the safety car was deployed. What I told him is that: you did a great race once again because you had a fantastic first lap where you battled. Then after the restart of the race following the safety car, the way that he drove and protected his position was surprising and exceptional. So, I told him to stay calm because his driving was fantastic.”

A sign of a healthy team situation is one where the team principal’s comments aren’t scrutinised, mediatised or just generally so significant. Whilst it is easy to ask Leclerc to “stay calm”, the act itself is being made more and more difficult, as the title slips out of reach due to circumstances beyond his control.

However, it isn’t too late to arrest the slide. Binotto said that Leclerc was “once again unlucky” on Sunday. But the sooner the team accepts its own agency in manufacturing that misfortune, the sooner Ferrari can learn from the mistakes made in past races and endow their lead driver with the strategic nouse befitting a driver of such talent. Should they do so, Leclerc could yet chain together a string of those elusive “perfect weekends”, claw back those lost points and posit himself once more as a genuine title-contender.

 

 

Photo courtesy Scuderia Ferrari Press Office

 

 

 

CSM study points to migration of Mediterranean fish

A new report by the Scientific Centre of Monaco shows that global warming will impact the number of fish living in the Mediterranean over the next century, sending many of the most common species consumed locally to northern EU waters.

The United Nations Ocean Summit has just wrapped up in Lisbon, with sustainable fishing taking front and centre at many of the debates. At the same time, the Scientific Centre of Monaco (CSM), in partnership with the ECOSEAS laboratory of the Côte d’Azur University, the Oceanographic Laboratory of Villefranche-sur-Mer, the National Museum of Natural History and the University of Littoral Côte d’Opale at Wimereux, released a scientific study highlighting the need to look at the impact of global warming on the distribution of fish being caught in local waters.

The report found that temperature is a major factor when it comes to regulating where species live and proliferate. As the seas grow warmer, many species common to the local waters of the Med, in particular those consumed for food, will start to migrate to cooler waters. This may not seem to be a huge deal, but for local fisheries, this shift will need to be taken into account in order to adapt.

The study, financed by the Prince Albert II Foundation, looked at the most likely evolution of the food fish of the Mediterranean, namely red mullet, common hake, white hake, sole, the common pageot, monkfish, sea bass, and gilthead seabream.

These fish represent just over 30% of the value of Mediterranean fisheries. The study used a modelling approach to estimate the current and future range of these eight economically viable fish species.

Using projections of changes in the climate under three scenarios over the course of the 21st century, it is likely there will be far fewer of these types of fish found in local waters as the models show them migrating to northern European coasts.

Of course, nothing is certain on this front, but the report does give fisheries a chance to rethink their way of working and anticipate the changes to mitigate the negative economic impact.

This report, the Scientific Centre says, will soon be followed by an economic impact study.

 

 

Photo by Alex Voulgaris on Unsplash

 

 

 

Arthur Leclerc wins at Silverstone to join championship hunt

Whilst Charles Leclerc suffered another frustrating afternoon at the wheel of his single-seater Ferrari on Sunday, Arthur Leclerc succeeded where his brother failed by winning the F3 British GP.

Victory for Arthur takes him to second and within just six points of F3 championship leader Victor Martins. Post-race, the young Monégasque was congratulated by his brothers (Charles and Lorenzo), who both watched Arthur take the chequered flag at the iconic circuit.

Arthur looked racey from the offset. Having got a less than ideal launch, he was forced to defend his second position during the opening corners, but having done so, he immediately launched an assault on Zak O’Sullivan’s Carlin.

The Prema driver attempted an audacious move around the outside of Stowe corner, but after pulling it off, he was forced to give the position back as the safety car had been brought out midway through the move.

Leclerc did then take the lead on lap six with a move around the outside of Brooklands, which gave him the inside line heading into Luffield, allowing the move to stick.

Whereas a late safety car undid Charles’ race in the afternoon, as the Monégasque moved from a race-winning position to outside the podium places, Arthur remained unfazed. As he had since the beginning of the race, he held position with good pace and zero errors.

Behind him, O’Sullivan and Prema team-mate Oliver Bearman, both hoping to clinch second place in their home grand prix, had a spectacular late tussle all the way to the line. As the two went side-by-side into the final corner, it was O’sullivan who held position by just 0.051’s of a second.

Post-race, Arthur Leclerc said, “I’m really happy about the win, we gave everything. Finally, a good weekend from beginning to end. We had a good qualifying and started on the front row. It was a hard race to keep it in front, we had a lot of degradation with the rear tyres. I was struggling quite a lot with the tyres but in the end, we made it to P1. Now on to Austria.”

With wind in his sails, Leclerc will hope to carry his form into Austria next weekend, where the Prema and Ferrari academy driver could very feasibly take the lead of the F3 championship.

 

 

Photo source: Prema

 

 

 

U Sciaratu Summer Carnival on the Rock

U Sciaratu, the summer carnival, is back on the Rock for its 10th edition, and this year it has an African theme! Get set for parades, musical troupes and other fun attractions, followed by a DJ in the Place de la Mairie.

Interview: American artist Amie Siegel

Monaco Life, in partnership with the Princess Grace Foundation-USA, is proud to present a monthly series highlighting the lives and artistic work of the Princess Grace Foundation-USA’s illustrious Award winners.

In this month’s exclusive interview, Princess Grace Foundation-USA’s Director of Programming Diana Kemppainen catches up with Princess Grace Award winner Amie Siegel to discuss her origins as an artist, and her epic new work, Bloodlines, on display at the National Galleries of Scotland.

Amie is an acclaimed artist who works in film, video, photography, sculpture, painting and installation. Her work is held in public collections across the globe including The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York; Tate Modern, London; the Museum of Modern Art, New York; the Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, Germany; and the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York.

Her latest work, Bloodlines, is a large-scale film installation in which she explores ideas of class and labour, and the relationship between private and public realms. Siegel follows the movement of paintings by English artist Georges Stubbs (1724-1806), from their homes in aristocratic country estates and public institutions across the UK to a Stubbs exhibition in a public gallery, and their subsequent return.

Firstly, can tell us what drew you to the arts or made you want to be an artist?

Amie Siegel: I was always drawing and painting from a very early age, but with a real seriousness. I was lucky in that my parents took me to art museums and talked about art with me, as well as theater, film and fashion. I grew up in Chicago, which is such a striking environment to be looking at and trying to understand as a visual child – the modernist skyscrapers cutting into that huge body of water, Lake Michigan.

We had a subscription to Steppenwolf Theatre, a small 30-person theater, and seeing all those productions, assessing the scenography, the writing, the dialogue, sitting in the dark for hours trying to grasp what was going on and how and why… even when I was very young, I think it made a huge impression on me.

Art very quickly became the thing I cared most about, along with reading and watching films, such that everything else seemed like it would be almost perverse for me to pursue as an adult. I carried that into my adult life for many years, everything else in my world was just utterly subordinate to making things. But, of course, this came from the feeling you get in the process of creating – that you’re onto something and just trying not to lose the thread but hold onto the thing, to keep it alive and shape it into a work, it’s just the best feeling. Everything is at stake, but you’re aware of it, trying to keep it afloat and develop it, until it can settle into an artwork.

‘Bloodlines’, photo credit: Jason Schmidt, courtesy Thomas Dane Gallery.

Your work encompasses many mediums. You work in film, video, photography, painting, sculpture, and installation. How do you choose which medium(s) to work with?

Usually, the project (and medium) chooses me. There should be a clear reason for working within a particular medium or materials, and usually it is a conceptual one. I am often following the journey of objects in my work.

In the instance of Bloodlines, it is paintings. But it has also been archeological artifacts, design objects, even marble, in prior works. Film becomes a gathering place to both assemble and represent the subtle details of an object but also to perform its movements. I actually don’t think of my film works as movies per se but as larger gestures of collage, where something (an object, chair, or painting) is cut out from its background and placed into a new context, and that journey or insertion into a new place speaks volumes about the differences between where an object lived before (how it was used, looked at, or valued) and where it reappears. That shift can tell us about how we care for objects, how we humans construct their values, or perpetuate the values we deem they represent.

Value, culture ownership, and image-making are recurring themes throughout your work. Tell us about Bloodlines, your new installation currently at the National Galleries of Scotland?

Bloodlines was filmed in numerous private estates throughout England and Scotland, as well as in public institutions, and follows the movement of paintings by the English artist George Stubbs (1724-1806) – he painted the British aristocracy: their families, most famously their horses, but also their dogs, hunts, shoots and their ‘exotic’ animal menageries. The film follows the paintings from the private stately homes where they reside and often were originally commissioned, to their exhibition in a public art museum, and subsequent return.

Through these movements, the film creates an intimate look into the world of elite cultural property, questioning the ownership of heritage and distinctions between private and public realms. As the film unfolds, people, property, animals and objects move between the real and the represented, creating a mirror of human, equine and artistic bloodlines. In creating a portrait of the places where these portraits reside, the labour and leisure within them, and the contemporary version of their subjects, the film thus depicts systems of class and inherited wealth, while subtly suggesting colonialism’s role in establishing and perpetuating these structures.

Bloodlines, photo credit: Jason Schmidt, courtesy Thomas Dane Gallery.

Bloodlines was supported in part by a Special Project grant from the Princess Grace Foundation. What did that support mean for this work?

The Special Project grant allowed the work to begin! I had the idea for Bloodlines, but time was passing, and the events I wanted to film were going to happen with or without me. Thankfully, the timing of the grant and its crucial support made it possible to catch the collection of the Stubbs paintings from the various stately homes across England and Scotland, which makes up the first 1/3 of the film.

Support from the Princess Grace Foundation is so meaningful and unique because it doesn’t stop when you receive that initial support as a student, it can continue throughout those critical years when you’re first out in the world as an artist and beyond. That is incredibly rare. I have received many wonderful grants and fellowships over the years, but only the Princess Grace Foundation creates a sustained relationship with artists, who can return for help in creating new works throughout their careers.

The support for my work began in 1999 when I was a graduate student at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. With that initial grant, I made my first film, The Sleepers, one that was shown at museums all over the world, including at the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York.

What do you hope the audience sees in the work?

I like when a work of art provokes viewers to ask questions, rather than stakes out a clear position or easy answer. With Bloodlines, the questions that arise when viewing the work – who owns cultural property, the persistence of the ruling class, how very much like the past (as represented in the Stubbs paintings) the present seems, the overwhelming presence of the colonial world and its hegemonies to this day, whether my piece is representing portraiture or is an act of portraiture itself… These are not answered by the artwork, but are questions raised by the artwork. It’s up to the viewer to form their own opinions and answers.

Bloodlines, photo credit: Jason Schmidt, courtesy Thomas Dane Gallery.

Princess Grace was also an artist that worked with different forms. She’s best known as an actress, but later worked with pressed flowers and needlework. If you could have a conversation with her, artist to artist, what might you say?

Oh gosh, I might want to share Laura Mulvey’s essay, ‘Visual Pleasure in Narrative Cinema’ with Princess Grace, which explores the concept of ‘The Male Gaze’ as played out in Hitchcock’s Rear Window, a film in which she starred. I would also be very curious to know what she thinks of Bloodlines, given her own Philadelphia ‘Main Line’ background and later entrance into royal life – I would imagine that would be a very interesting discussion about status, aristocracy, and privilege! As to her endeavors with pressed flowers and needlework, certainly a mutual studio visit would be in order.

 

The Princess Grace Foundation-USA is dedicated to upholding the legacy of Her Serene Highness Princess Grace of Monaco (neé Grace Kelly), and elevating extraordinary emerging artists in theatre, dance and film through career-advancing grants. Follow along at @princessgraceus.

 

 

Photo credit: © Jason Schmidt, Courtesy Thomas Dane Gallery.

 

 

 

Two Poles, a Common Future

Alongside the UN Ocean Conference in Lisbon, Prince Albert has made a call to action, asking around 100 high-level guests to lend their voices to the plight of the polar regions and support the Two Poles, a Common Future initiative.

The Prince Albert-led talk, Polar Oceans: Driving Force of the Global Ocean, at the United Nations Ocean Conference, held from 28th June to 1st July in Lisbon, drew over a hundred high-level guests to hear about the current situation in the polar regions.

Held by the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation, alongside the Oceanographic Institute and the Océano Azul Foundation, a panel of scientists, polar experts and artists came together to discuss the importance of the polar oceans as “vectors of global ocean and climate change, but also the need to contribute to better hear the messages of scientists.”

In his opening speech, Prince Albert said that, “the Poles constitute an essential link in the oceanic system (…) both as regards to oceanic balances, those of species, currents and major planetary fluxes, as well as with regard to the preservation of the climate. For my part, I would like to underline the extent to which this role is also political, as the Poles concentrate, like a laboratory, most of the questions that we face when it comes to acting for the oceans.”  

He went on to explain that there are solutions, saying the “prospects for solutions, in particular through a certain number of lines of work whose effectiveness we know” are in sight.

The first session, moderated by Dr Renuka Badhe, Executive Secretary of the European Polar Board, recalled the importance of the Arctic and Southern Oceans on a global scale, but also underscored the need for collaborative and inclusive work. Teacher Michael Meredith, oceanographer and science leader at the British Antarctic Survey, said that there is only one ocean and it provides connectivity on a planetary scale. However, the circulation of ocean currents is already changing and will continue to change in the future with repercussions both on our climate and on ecosystems and global populations. Unfortunately, our current ability to predict the timing and magnitude of these changes in the Poles is still limited, which hampers the implementation of efficient climate policies.

Photo by Gaëtan Luci, Prince’s Palace

Initiating the Polar Ocean Action Plans as part of the UN Decade of Ocean Science is an important step, said Dr Sian Henley, Lecturer in Marine Science at the University of Edinburgh and Vice President of the Southern Ocean Observing System.

Next up, Florence Colleoni, Glaciologist and Paleoclimatologist at the National Institute of Oceanography and applied geophysics (OGS) and Richard Bellerby, Scientific Director for Climate and Oceans at the Norwegian Institute of Water Research, spoke about loss of sea ice, acidification and the effects of these two phenomena globally.

The second session moderated by Ashok Adicéam, Special Advisor to the French Ambassador for the Poles and Maritime Affairs, focused on mediation. The need to evoke emotion to convey messages about the urgency of the situation was addressed. Building stories that directly reach the hearts of audiences, they said, is a powerful way to bring about awareness and to get more active responses from the population.

The talk ended with a call to action, inviting all those assembled to mobilise and lend their voices to the plight of the polar regions. There were five specific ways suggested to do so, and were put into a single document, entitled Two Poles, a Common Future.

The points it touches on are addressing the fact that there is a problem, increasing investment in polar research, minimising pressure on the regions, building collaboration between the Arctic and Antarctic communities, and being a voice for the regions.

 

 

Photo of Prince Albert in Lisbon, credit: Sarah Del Ben